ANZJS - Editorial Matters
Report to NZSA AGM 2006
Australia and New Zealand Journal Of Statistics - ANZJS
1. Activities since last report
1.1 Editorial Board
The final changes to the Editorial Board of the Journal have been confirmed.
The Editorial Board now comprises Kerrie Mengersen (Managing Editor),
Stephen Haslett (Theory and Methods), Jeff Wood (Applications) and Ken
Russell (Technical). The contributions to the Journal made by the former
members of the Editorial Board are warmly acknowledged.
1.2 Submissions
More than 80 manuscripts have been submitted to the Journal since January
2006. This is a pleasing rate of submission and gives opportunity for
careful selection of papers on the basis of quality, composition and attractiveness
to our readership.
As initiated by the previous Editorial team, the backlog of papers has
been substantially reduced, so that time between acceptance and publication
of papers is now much more reasonable.
Review times continue to be monitored. A summary of review times for
manuscripts submitted in 2006 is given in the following plot. It is clear
that some manuscripts are still subject to unacceptably long delays of
more than three months.
Another issue under consideration by the Editorial team is the length
of time for revisions of manuscripts. At present there is no limit to
this, which means that Associate Editors and reviewers may be asked to
remember and reconsider manuscripts that were submitted more than twelve
months ago.
1.3 Operations
Interaction between the Editorial team and Blackwell, as the publisher
of the Journal, has been very positive. The efforts of the publishers,
in particular Foong-Ee Tan and Sussan Au (Production Editor) are appreciated
in assisting the new Editorial team. Procedures, division of tasks and
author submission requirements will continue to be settled in the next
twelve months.
The web-based production system used by Blackwell appears to be working
well. As described by the publishers, “Using Author Services, authors
have the ability to track the progress of their manuscripts from receipt
at Blackwell through the production process to publication online and
in print. Registered authors benefit from free access to the full text
of their papers in Blackwell Synergy as well as a 20% discount on Blackwell
publications… Author Services will be further enhanced in 2006 to
include readership and citations per article in Blackwell Synergy.”
1.4 Profile
The online readership of the journal continues to grow. As reported
by Blackwell, “in 2005, ANZJS articles were downloaded 14,795 times
through Blackwell Synergy and other online hosts. This compares with 10,263
in 2004; an increase of 44%.”
The following information was kindly provided by Nick Melchior, Blackwell’s
Journal Publishing Coordinator, Asia.
The 2005 Journal Citation Reports from the ISI's Science Citation Index
reveal that the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics has seen
a 48% increase in its Impact Factor, from 0.387 in 2004 to 0.573 in 2005.
This is the third year running that the journal has seen an increase and
2005 sees the second highest impact factor the journal has achieved. The
2005 Impact Factor is derived from articles published in 2003 and 2004.
Despite this impressive rise, the journal remained ranked 59th in the
Statistics & Probability category for the third consecutive year,
albeit from a larger pool of journals (75 in 2003, 77 in 2004 and 81 in
2005).
2. Activities over next 12 months
2.1 Editorial Board
Communication and interaction will continue to be consolidated among
the Editorial team.
Increased communication between the Society and the Editorial Board will
continue to be subject of discussion in 2006.
Standard documents used for communicating with authors, Associate Editors
and reviewers will continued to be reviewed in light of changed practices.
An assistant Technical Editor will be appointed in the next month.
The review of Associate Editors will be completed with the Editorial
team. The new board of Associate Editors will be confirmed with the Editors
before being published on the website and in future issues.
2.2 Operations
In addition to continuing to consolidate the journal publication processes,
a number of issues continue to be pursued with Blackwell.
Online Open is a service provided by Blackwell whereby accepted manuscripts
are made available electronically by the Publisher prior to formal publication,
thus facilitating faster access to papers. The Editorial team strongly
supports the introduction of this initiative for ANZJS and is working
with the Societies to investigate the financial implications.
A web-based submission service is also provided by Blackwell. The potential
advantages of this electronic editorial office (EEO) will be discussed
with the Editorial team and the Society Executive. Blackwell cites reports
of a median decrease in refereeing times of 25% and an average growth
in volume of submissions of 20% arising from such online services.
Review times and time between acceptance and publication will continue
to be monitored.
Copyright remains a topic of active discussion among authors, the Editorial
team and the publisher. These have also been motivated by changing demands
by funding bodies and employers. Blackwell has responded positively with
a range of options, including (i) an Exclusive Licence Form that allows
authors to retain the copyright of their article while granting the journal
the exclusive rights to publish it; (ii) self-archiving the final version
of an article on personal websites or institutional repositories after
an embargo period with a link to the definitive published version on Blackwell
Synergy for citation, and (iii) Online Open services; see above.
2.3 Profile
- The profile of the Journal continues to be the topic of discussion
among the Editorial Board. This includes:
- The focus of the journal: who is the target audience and what do
they want in the Journal?
- The impact of the journal: how can measures such as the Impact Factor
be improved for the Journal?
- The content of the journal: the role of reviews, book reviews, statistical
education and applications will be carefully considered.
To this end, five main activities are planned for the next year.
- Blackwell’s initiative, Author Feedback, “will gather
feedback from authors on their experience during the peer review and
production processes. The corresponding author of every article published
will be asked a short set of questions on his/her experience with the
publishing process.” Answers will be collated annually and shared
with societies and editors.
- A separate survey of journal readers and Society members will be
undertaken in collaboration with Blackwell in the second half of 2006,
in order to elicit interests of readers, preferences for articles and
ideas for increasing readership and impact. The results of the survey
and interviews will be published in the Newsletter and will be summarised
as an action plan by the Editorial team.
- The Editorial team will conduct a series of interviews with the editors
of other journals over the next year in order to solicit ideas about
improving readership, impact factor and focus of the journal.
- The Editorial team will solicit a series of invited reviews on topics
of current interest. These papers will form an ongoing section of the
journal.
- A review will be undertaken of the status of the Applications section
of the journal. Despite the commitment of the Editorial team to this
section and the evident interest that these papers generate, it remains
strongly undersubscribed.
This report is an edited version of material supplied by Prof Kerrie Mengersen,
Managing Editor, ANZJS
Stephen Haslett
Theory and Methods Editor
ANZJS
28 June 2006
ANZJS - Organizational Matters
Structure of SSAI-ASPAI and Publication of ANZJS
Discussion Paper
Neville Bartlett, Statistical Society of Australia, June
2006
Summary
This discussion paper outlines the current configuration of SSAI-ASPAI
and their role in the publication of The Australian and New Zealand Journal
of Statistics (ANZJS). It is proposed that this structure be reviewed
in an effort to provide the New Zealand Statistical Association (NZSA)
with a more direct role in the management of ANZJS and to simplify the
working within SSAI. Any such changes will not be allowed to adversely
affect the autonomy of the editorial decisions made by ANZJS editorial
team.
Introduction
The Statistical Society of Australia has two central registered organisations,
namely, the Statistical Society of Australia Incorporated (SSAI) and Australian
Statistical Publishing Association Incorporated (ASPAI). Both of these
bodies are incorporated in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) and
are separate to the six branches based in Canberra, Queensland, New South
Wales, Victoria, South Australia and Western Australia. ASPAI was originally
setup to carry out publication of the journal (the Australian Journal
of Statistics) and the SSAI Newsletter.
Since 1998 the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics (ANZJS)
has been jointly produced with the NZSA via an agreement with the publisher
Blackwell. ANZJS replaced the Australian Journal of Statistics published
by ASPAI and the New Zealand Statistician published by NZSA. A memorandum
of understanding between NZSA and SSAI governs how the Journal is funded
and the structure of the editorial team. A journal capitation fee per
member paid to ASPAI funds ANZJS publication.
Current Configuration
SSAI and ASPAI are two separate bodies that require separate accounts
and meetings. SSAI and ASPAI have the same central councils made up of
representatives from the Branches (with the number of delegates related
to branch membership numbers) and Sections as well an Executive made up
of the President, Secretary, Treasurer and ANZJS Editor. NZSA has no representation
on ASPAI even though ASPAI’s primary purpose is the publication
of ANZJS and the SSAI Newsletter.
Funds to support SSAI are raised by charging each branch an annual capitation
fee per member and part of this capitation fee is forwarded onto ASPAI
to cover the ANZJS capitation fee and the cost of publishing the SSAI
Newsletter.
Since ASPAI was first created many things have changed and these include:
• Incorporated bodies in Australia are subject to increased regulation
• ASPAI currently does not employ people to carry out copy editing
and typesetting
• The publisher (Blackwell) looks after collection of all institutional
subscriptions and almost all of the publication process from the point
of acceptance of papers
• The introduction of a goods and service tax (GST) in Australia
has increased the need for disciplined financial recording and regular
lodgement of GST returns
• The financial position regarding the journal is much more stable
and assured.
There are two areas of difficulty with the current structure:
1. NZSA has an indirect role in the (non-editorial) management of ANZJS
that is structurally inappropriate as well as being vulnerable to unnecessary
‘surprises’.
2. The structure/working of the SSAI/ASPAI relationship in its current
form does not seem to offer any benefits to SSAI members and works against
providing NZSA with up-to-date and relevant financial information regarding
ANZJS.
Each of these aspects is sufficient on its own to warrant a review of
alternatives.
Potential Future Structure
Objectives
• Provide NZSA with a more direct and equitable role with regard
to the overall and financial management of ANZJS and the relationship
with its publisher without decreasing the autonomy of the ANZJS editorial
team.
• Simplify the structure of SSAI/ASPAI so that it is easier to manage
as well as being clearer to the SSAI membership.
• Put in place a board of management for ANZJS that enables appropriate
consideration of short and longer term publication issues as well as providing
the ANZJS editorial team with a forum to raise general issues.
• Facilitate the financial management of ANZJS in a way that is
much more transparent to both NZSA and SSAI.
• Provide a structure that keeps options open regarding how the
ANZJS is published in the future.
Management Board for ANZJS
A board could be established with:
• 6-8 people with at least 3 from each of NZSA and SSAI
• 1-2 others with particular and relevant skills/experience
• Membership will be for 4 years and renewable in 1 year increments
so that a good balance is struck between maintaining knowledge while ensuring
some new minds are introduced
• Chair would be for 2 years at a time and would be expected to
alternate between NZSA and SSAI representatives
• Editorial team members will have an open invitation to all board
meetings
• The board will be based in Australia under the auspices of SSAI
unless substantial benefits can be shown for it to be a subcommittee of
NZSA.
The role of the board would be to:
• Manage the relationship with the publisher (currently Blackwell)
• Consider alternative forms of publication and relationship with
publishers
• Appoint people to the editorial team
• Co-ordinate the financial affairs of ANZJS including recommendation
of capitation fees and regular reporting of financial status. Formal approval
of all recommendations would still rest with SSAI and NZSA but the board’s
role will be to ensure that all recommendations are debated appropriately
and well constructed.
• Keep members of both NZSA and SSAI up to date with journal related
matters.
Financial Management of ANZJS
Audited annual financial statements will be supplied to NZSA and SSAI
in suitable time for annual general meetings and other relevant meetings.
Funds required for the publication of ANZJS from NZSA and SSAI will be
calculated on a per member basis (as currently) or by agreement between
the two societies. Any refunds will also be calculated on the same basis
unless otherwise agreed by both NZSA and SSAI. It is expected that the
management board will have a modest reserve of funds available to use
at its discretion. The publication of festschrifts and the reduction of
publication backlogs by publishing bumper issues would be two examples
of appropriate uses of such a reserve.
Editorial Management of ANZJS
The current autonomy of the ANZJS editorial team will be protected. There
has been a long tradition of allowing maximum autonomy for the editorial
team to handle editorial issues and this tradition will be maintained.
Any new structure/arrangement regarding ANZJS must provide the editorial
team with clear financial guidelines and act as a forum for the editorial
team to raise general policy issues and actions that would require extra
funds or other forms of support.
Afterword by Murray Jorgensen
Neville's article pretty well outlines the areas that will be under
discussion between the two societies over the next few months. If you
have any questions about these proposals or comments that you would like
to make, please get in touch with Roger Littlejohn and/or myself. We are
keen that the final arrangement gets the broadest possible support.